Blu-ray cost-benefit analysis for long-term data backup versus SSD/HDD
Key claims
- Blu-ray offers lowest cost-per-TB and longest retention for archival backup compared to SSDs and HDDs.
Volume over time
No hourly data yet.
Source threads (1)
Every thread this story was extracted from, with live and archive links so the evidence is verifiable.
- /g/109296207 ↗ live · archive neutral developing 7 replies Blu-ray offers lowest cost-per-TB and longest retention for archival backup compared to SSDs and HDDs.
Related stories
- Btrfs filesystem write amplification compared to ext4 and xfs 2 mentions · shared: ssd
- Project ideas for salvaged LTO-6 tape drive and 60 tapes 1 mentions · shared: ssd
- Rising costs of RAM and storage capacity in consumer devices 14 mentions · shared: hdd, ssd
- Speculation on storage device market value surge 1 mentions
- Confusion over memory transfer rate specifications 1 mentions
- SO-DIMM DDR5 adapter cost-free AM4 platform upgrade feasibility 1 mentions