Argument that non-violent movements are backed by implicit force
Key claims
- So-called non-violent movements like women's suffrage actually succeeded via implicit threat of force, since elites only tolerate them when force is off the table.
Volume over time
No hourly data yet.
Source threads (1)
Every thread this story was extracted from, with live and archive links so the evidence is verifiable.
- /pol/542746549 ↗ live · archive neutral evergreen 27 replies So-called non-violent movements like women's suffrage actually succeeded via implicit threat of force, since elites only tolerate them when force is off the table.
Related stories
- Question why socialists never criticize left-wing millionaires and billionaires 1 mentions
- Image-reaction thread seeking agreement 1 mentions
- KTETFN social club grievance 1 mentions
- Claim women leaders work harder than male leaders 1 mentions
- 'New trvke dropped' meme post 1 mentions
- Government-wide printer outage speculation 1 mentions