Claims biblical Milah circumcision differed from later Jewish Periah ritual
Key claims
- Argues biblical circumcision (Milah) was only partial foreskin removal, distinct from the later radical Jewish practice of Periah.
Volume over time
No hourly data yet.
Source threads (1)
Every thread this story was extracted from, with live and archive links so the evidence is verifiable.
- /pol/543954936 ↗ live · archive neutral evergreen 28 replies Argues biblical circumcision (Milah) was only partial foreskin removal, distinct from the later radical Jewish practice of Periah.
Related stories
- Christian apologetics claim YHWH pictographs foreshadow Jesus 3 mentions
- Why 'denounce the Talmud' but never 'denounce the Torah'? 2 mentions
- Critique of 'Judeo-Christian' terminology 1 mentions
- Post on Ashkenazi Crohn's disease prevalence 1 mentions
- Complaint that /pol/ has declined and can't distinguish Mizrahi from Ashkenazi Jews 1 mentions
- Black Hebrew Israelite-adjacent post urging Jews to keep bloodline pure 1 mentions