Question why /pol/ supports a Romani ethnostate but not a Jewish one
Key claims
- The poster asks why /pol/ supports an ethnostate for gypsies but not for Jews.
- Thread poses a context-free hypothetical asking how /pol/ would react.
- OP asks how undercover agents or glownets conduct operations on /pol/.
Volume over time
Peak 1 mentions/hour · 3 hourly buckets
Source threads (3)
Every thread this story was extracted from, with live and archive links so the evidence is verifiable.
- /pol/544130599 ↗ live · archive suspicious evergreen 8 replies OP asks how undercover agents or glownets conduct operations on /pol/.
- /pol/544117931 ↗ live · archive neutral evergreen 8 replies Thread poses a context-free hypothetical asking how /pol/ would react.
- /pol/544107110 ↗ live · archive neutral evergreen 1 replies The poster asks why /pol/ supports an ethnostate for gypsies but not for Jews.
Related stories
- Complaint that /pol/ has declined and can't distinguish Mizrahi from Ashkenazi Jews 1 mentions · shared: pol
- Racist thread on Japanese feminization culture 3 mentions · shared: jews
- Christian apologetics claim YHWH pictographs foreshadow Jesus 3 mentions
- Why 'denounce the Talmud' but never 'denounce the Torah'? 2 mentions
- Critique of 'Judeo-Christian' terminology 1 mentions
- Post on Ashkenazi Crohn's disease prevalence 1 mentions